---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

---

In two-way trading in the foreign exchange market, a clear consensus has gradually formed among retail traders with small capital: even if they can obtain so-called "inside information," it has little practical impact on their actual profits. This perception is not subjective, but rather stems from the limited capital of retail traders themselves, the trading characteristics of the foreign exchange market, and the application logic of inside information. Ultimately, insider information becomes a resource that appears useful but is actually ineffective for retail traders.

---

Given the core limitation of retail traders—the size of their initial capital—even if they are fortunate enough to obtain key insider information regarding central bank policy adjustments, major economic data releases, or geopolitical events, it is difficult for them to achieve significant profits with limited capital. The scale of returns from forex trading is inherently tied to the initial capital. Retail investors often start with only a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars. Even if they capitalize on precise market fluctuations guided by insider information, the absolute returns they can generate are significantly capped. For example, if a retail investor with $10,000 in initial capital predicts a 5% one-way fluctuation in a currency pair based on insider information, even if they perfectly capitalize on this trend, their ultimate profit will only be $500. Even if the market fluctuates by an extreme 20%, the profit will only be $2,000. This level of returns will not significantly improve their living standards, let alone achieve financial freedom. Furthermore, the forex market is influenced by central bank intervention and the macroeconomic environment, making extreme market conditions that can double or even exceed returns for small investors rare. Most insider information correlates to market fluctuations of only 1% to 3%. After deducting transaction costs (such as spreads and fees), the actual returns a retail investor can earn are even more minimal, further highlighting the reality that insufficient initial capital renders insider information useless.
This disparity in capital also creates a fundamental difference between retail investors and professional institutions like investment banks, funds, and sovereign wealth funds when it comes to utilizing insider information. For institutions, insider information is a core resource that can create enormous value, but for retail traders with small capital, it rarely yields the same benefit. Professional institutions typically possess billions or even tens of billions of dollars in capital. Even if the market fluctuation corresponding to insider information is only 1%, institutions can still generate tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars in returns through large-scale position placement. This return is sufficient to cover research and transaction costs and generate significant profit growth for the institutions. Furthermore, institutions possess sophisticated trading systems, ample liquidity support, and professional risk control teams, enabling them to quickly enter and exit large positions after obtaining insider information, maximizing market returns and avoiding slippage losses caused by insufficient liquidity. In contrast, retail traders with small capital not only have limited capital, making it difficult to generate significant absolute returns from insider information, but they may also face high slippage costs when executing trades due to rudimentary trading systems and a lack of liquidity. Even if they accurately predict market trends, their actual returns will be significantly reduced. They may even miss the best trading opportunities due to operational delays, completely negating the value of insider information.
Precisely because of this practical difference, sophisticated retail traders with small capital tend not to envy the access to insider information offered by professional institutions. They clearly understand that the value of insider information is deeply tied to the user's capital scale, operational capabilities, and resource reserves. Institutions can achieve profit growth through insider information because they possess the basic conditions to digest insider information and convert it into actual returns—precisely these conditions lacked by retail traders. For retail investors, instead of wasting time chasing hard-to-obtain and ineffective insider information, they should focus on improving their trading skills and optimizing their risk control systems. By systematically studying technical and fundamental analysis methods, they can master the core logic of identifying market trends; by developing a scientific position management strategy, they can control risk exposure within limited capital; and through long-term real-world trading, they can build experience and develop a trading system tailored to their capital scale. While these measures won't allow retail investors to reap the same massive profits as institutions through insider information, they can help them achieve a stable existence and steady profits in the forex market, gradually expanding their capital. This is far more practical than chasing the illusory nature of insider information.
From the perspective of forex market regulation and compliance, the acquisition and use of insider information itself carries significant legal risks. Financial regulators in most countries (such as the US SEC and the UK FCA) explicitly prohibit the use of insider information for trading. If retail investors attempt to obtain insider information through informal channels and use it for trading, they risk not only regulatory penalties but also falling prey to fraudulent schemes (such as using false insider information to induce account openings and deposits), ultimately resulting in the loss of their principal. For retail traders with small capital, the dual risks of "legal risk + risk of capital loss" further diminish the appeal of insider information and deepen their understanding that relying on insider information is not the right approach to forex trading. Only legal and rational trading methods can achieve long-term success in the market.
In summary, the perception among retail traders that "insider information is useless" in two-way forex trading is a rational judgment based on their limited capital, the gap in capabilities compared to professional institutions, and the market regulatory environment. For retail investors, recognizing the ineffectiveness of insider information, abandoning the blind pursuit of insider information, and focusing instead on improving their own trading skills is the correct path to sustainable development in the forex market. This understanding will not only help retail investors avoid unnecessary risks and misconceptions, but also guide them to develop a more pragmatic and rational trading philosophy, laying a solid foundation for long-term profitability.

In the two-way trading landscape of forex, many forex traders are gradually realizing that turning to stocks may be a wiser option, as stocks are relatively easier to profit from.

---

In contrast, the forex market is characterized by low liquidity, low risk, and low returns. Central banks around the world monitor fluctuations in their currencies in real time to ensure stable market trends, rather than frequent large swings. Large fluctuations are relatively rare and typically short-lived. This market characteristic makes forex investing essentially a market where you can bet big on small, rather than small on big. This means that only through long-term, prudent investment and sound risk management can traders achieve sustainable returns in the forex market. The lack of liquidity in the forex market makes it more difficult to make money in forex trading than in stocks and futures.
Furthermore, the forex market is actually riskier than the stock market, and many more people suffer losses. In some regions, stock markets have protective mechanisms, such as the inability to buy and sell two-way and the lack of leverage. These mechanisms reduce investor risk to a certain extent. In contrast, the foreign exchange market allows for two-way buying and selling, offers leverage, and allows traders to close their positions within the day. Although the forex market operates without restrictions, its risks are completely different from those of the stock market. In fact, many people only turn to the relatively simpler stock market after suffering losses in the forex market.

In two-way trading in the forex market, a core question that plagues many traders is: Is the technical analysis (such as candlestick patterns, trend indicators, and support and resistance level analysis) that they have spent so much time studying truly useful?

---

The answer lies not in theoretical learning but in practical real-world trading. The value of technical analysis lies not in mastering theoretical knowledge but in whether it can be translated into stable profitability in actual trading. This "theory-practice-value verification" logic is the core premise for the effectiveness of technical analysis in forex trading.
To understand this logic more simply, we can compare "learning technical analysis well" to "passing a professional exam," and "real-time trading" to "entering the workplace." Passing the exam means a trader has mastered the basic theory, indicator usage, and analytical framework of technical analysis, much like a student scoring 100% on an exam demonstrates a high level of understanding of the key concepts. However, there's no direct correlation between exam scores and workplace competence. Just as a student scoring 100% on an exam doesn't necessarily guarantee a high salary upon entering the workplace, employers assess an employee's value based on whether they can create tangible value for the company and contribute to profitability. If an employee can't translate their knowledge into practical work, even excellent exam scores won't guarantee a high salary. The study and application of technical analysis follow precisely the same logic: mastering technical analysis theory is merely "passing the exam," while being able to apply these theories in real trading to predict market trends, control risk, and achieve profitability is the key to "creating value in work." If technical analysis fails to generate profits for traders in real trading, even the most solid theoretical grasp remains merely theoretical, unable to truly deliver results.
This discrepancy between "exam and work" essentially reflects the core difference between technical analysis theory and real-world trading. Technical analysis in the theoretical learning phase involves interpreting historical market trends in an idealized market environment. Without time pressure or financial risk, learners can calmly analyze past candlestick charts and accurately identify entry and exit points that align with technical patterns. This "post-analysis" scenario is like facing fixed knowledge points and standard answers in an exam; as long as the method is mastered, the correct conclusion can be reached. However, live trading is fraught with uncertainty: real-time market conditions are influenced by multiple factors, including breaking news (such as central bank policy adjustments and geopolitical events), market sentiment fluctuations, and liquidity changes. The formation and breakthrough of technical patterns are often accompanied by "false signals." Traders are faced with limited timeframes for decision-making while simultaneously bearing the psychological pressure of capital gains and losses. This "real-time dynamic decision-making" process, like facing complex and ever-changing tasks in the workplace, requires not only professional knowledge but also the ability to flexibly adjust strategies based on actual circumstances and cope with unexpected challenges. Relying solely on theoretical knowledge and applying it mechanically is likely to lead to poor decisions.
Therefore, practice is not only the only way to test the effectiveness of technical analysis but also a necessary step in transforming theoretical knowledge into practical skills. After mastering technical analysis theory, traders shouldn't rush to invest large sums in real-time trading. Instead, they should follow a path of "trial trading with small amounts of capital—gradual adaptation—and validation." First, apply the learned technical analysis methods to real market conditions through a small trial trading volume (e.g., trading 5%-10% of your principal). This allows you to experience the difference between theory and real-time trading in a low-risk environment. For example, observe whether clear support levels from historical trends truly hold up in real-time trading, and whether golden cross signals from moving averages lag or become false signals. Through this trial trading process, traders can gradually find the right balance between technical analysis and real-time trading, completing a similar "internship" period in the workplace. The core goal of this stage isn't profit, but rather to familiarize themselves with the real-time trading process, verify the effectiveness of technical analysis in different market conditions, and hone their resilience to profit and loss, avoiding letting emotional fluctuations influence their decision-making.
After accumulating sufficient experience through a small trial period and being able to consistently make sound decisions based on technical analysis, traders need to further validate the true value of technical analysis through "profit verification." Technical analysis is only truly useful when it can help traders earn substantial profits in real trading, achieving long-term, stable profits, rather than occasional, lucky gains. This is similar to how, after an internship, employees must demonstrate their value and earn a high salary by completing significant projects and generating profits for the company. If, in real trading, a trader can accurately identify trend trends through technical analysis, enter markets at key points, and set appropriate stop-loss and take-profit targets, ultimately achieving sustained growth in their account equity, this indicates that technical analysis has been successfully translated into profitability. Conversely, if long-term reliance on technical analysis continues to result in losses, or profits are entirely dependent on luck rather than technical judgment, this indicates problems with the application of technical analysis (such as a lack of solid theoretical understanding, insufficient adaptability in real trading, or a failure to adjust strategies based on market characteristics). This suggests a need to re-evaluate learning methods or optimize application logic.
From a professional trading perspective, the practical validation of technical analysis must adhere to the principle of "dynamic adjustment." Foreign exchange market characteristics (such as volatility, trend strength, and the frequency of central bank intervention) change with the macroeconomic environment. Once-effective technical analysis methods may become ineffective due to market structural adjustments. For example, during periods of low volatility in the foreign exchange market, technical analysis based on "range breakouts" may be highly effective. However, when the market enters a period of high volatility, this method may lead to losses due to an increase in false breakouts. Therefore, in practice, traders should not treat technical analysis as a "fixed tool" but should continuously optimize it based on market dynamics. By reviewing real-time data and analyzing the win rate and profit-loss ratio of technical analysis methods in the current market environment, traders can promptly adjust indicator parameters or supplement other analytical dimensions (such as incorporating fundamental analysis) to ensure that technical analysis remains relevant to market characteristics. This is also the key to transforming technical analysis from "theory" into a "practical tool."
In summary, the usefulness of technical analysis in forex trading is not determined by theoretical study but rather requires practical testing. The metaphor of learning technical analysis as an "exam" and real-world trading as a "job" clearly illustrates the fundamental difference between theory and practice. A strong test score doesn't guarantee success in the workplace, and similarly, a solid grasp of technical analysis theory doesn't guarantee profitability in trading. Only by accumulating experience through trial trading with small amounts of capital, dynamically adjusting strategies in real-world trading, and ultimately achieving stable profits can the true value of technical analysis be proven. For traders, fostering a practice-first mindset and avoiding the pitfalls of theoretical analysis are the key to truly leveraging technical analysis for trading and improving profitability.

In two-way trading in forex, high leverage and heavy short-term positions can easily lead traders into gambling rather than stable long-term investments.

---

This trading method is extremely attractive to forex market "gamblers" because a single heavy position can potentially yield tenfold or even twentyfold returns. This enormous potential reward significantly stimulates dopamine release in traders, creating a reward mechanism in their brains that encourages them to repeat this high-risk behavior. They even take this trading method as a golden rule, advocating "How can you make a profit without heavy positions?" and viewing it as the only path to trading success.
In the course of their careers as forex traders, they often encounter a wide variety of traders, from novice to experienced, each with a variety of trading theories and viewpoints. While the majority of traders believe in the "heavy position" theory of profitability, some veterans still cling to this strategy. Perhaps due to obsession or a sense of being trapped in a difficult situation, they are unwilling to abandon this high-risk trading method and remain unwavering in their faith.
These traders often lack patience, never waiting for the right entry point, and lack a clear trading plan, relying solely on the greed and courage of a "gambler." They chase short-term high returns, entering the market with heavy positions, closing them immediately upon profits and clinging to losses. Ultimately, they either go bankrupt or experience a massive profit. Human greed is difficult to control. If you believe that trading requires patience, then the forex market doesn't always offer opportunities. We should act like a qualified hunter, patiently waiting for the right prey and striking it dead, rather than acting blindly, which only leads to a loss of rationality and purpose.
Proper position management is undoubtedly the core of trading. Forex traders shouldn't be tempted by a single or two high returns, thinking they can turn things around. Otherwise, they're just gambling. If they treat the market like a casino and don't control their desires, it will eventually devour them. Whether they have large or small capital, they won't be able to make a splash in this market.
The forex market requires proper position management. Avoid a gambling mentality and patiently wait for quality opportunities. Only in this way can returns be sustained and stable. Heavily invested capital may bring temporary high returns, but it often ends in a loss. Only by overcoming human weaknesses and maintaining a rational view of the market can one stand out in this market and become a long-standing force, rather than a fleeting meteor.

In the two-way trading scenario of forex investment, for retail traders with limited capital, the key to sustainable development must focus on swing trading and long-term investment, rather than short-term operations.

---

This conclusion isn't arbitrary, but rather a comprehensive deduction based on the characteristics of small retail investors, market dynamics, and risk-return ratios. Small retail investors often lack sufficient risk tolerance and professional trading resources. Short-term trading, with its extremely high requirements for operational precision, market responsiveness, and emotional control, presents a significant mismatch with retail investors' actual conditions. However, swing and long-term trading, by extending the time horizon, can better smooth out short-term market volatility risks, meeting the core needs of small retail investors seeking stable capital growth.
A deeper analysis of short-term trading in forex reveals that it is not inherently gambling, but rather akin to gambling. Short-term trading typically yields quick returns, attempting to profit from market fluctuations within a very short period of time. However, under this model, trading decisions are easily influenced by short-term market fluctuations, leading to emotional dominance. Successful short-term trades can foster blind confidence and lead to ignoring potential risks. When losses occur, traders may become eager to recover, leading to irrational and frequent trading. Over time, small retail traders will gradually develop impatience with swing and long-term trading, believing that these types of trading require long waits for opportunities, lack the appeal of the process, and that the expected profits are mediocre compared to the short-term gains of short-term trading, far less intense than the immediate thrill and satisfaction it brings. Consequently, they will actively abandon trading models that better suit them.
Further observation reveals that after small retail traders experience rapid profits through short-term trading, their psychological threshold for profit speed is significantly raised. This increased threshold gradually erodes their patience for swing and long-term trading, and may even cause them to lose their core skills in swing and long-term trading—the ability to calmly analyze market trends and patiently wait for key signals, replaced by the "instant feedback" developed through short-term trading. In fact, small retail traders who already have the ability to consistently profit from swing trading should resolutely avoid short-term trading, as its gambling nature remains unchanged regardless of their experience or ability. Traders should never overestimate their ability to control their own restraint and human desires. Greed, an innate human trait, is magnified in the high-volatility, high-incentive environment of short-term trading. Many retail traders with small capital attempt to maximize profits by engaging in short-term trading, citing "long wait times and insufficient returns" as reasons for using their free time to engage in short-term trading. However, they overlook the crucial importance of this period of waiting in a short position for swing and long-term trading. This period allows traders to transcend the volatile market conditions and examine market trends from a broader and more rational perspective, avoiding the distractions of short-term fluctuations that can disrupt their trading strategy and ensure the accuracy of their swing and long-term trading decisions.
In the practice of forex two-way trading, some retail traders with small capital may face this dilemma: they have mastered the core techniques of swing and long-term trading and can achieve stable profits, but due to their small capital size, their capital utilization is low and their payback period is long, resulting in slow initial capital accumulation. The correct strategy for this situation is to gradually expand their capital base through the lens of compound interest, rather than blindly turning to short-term trading. The core principle of compound interest lies in continuously converting profits into new investment capital through sustained, stable returns, forming a virtuous cycle of "return-return-return." For example, if a small retail trader can maintain a stable annual return of 15%-20%, through the compounding effect, over 5-10 years, their original capital will multiply several times, achieving their original accumulation goal. In contrast, the gambling nature of short-term trading means its returns are highly uncertain. Not only can stable growth not be guaranteed, but a single significant loss can wipe out all previous profits, or even lead to a loss of principal, completely contradicting the original accumulation goal of small retail traders. Therefore, whether from the perspective of risk control or long-term returns, short-term trading should not be the choice of small retail traders. Adhering to swing trading and long-term strategies, and leveraging compounding, is the correct path to achieving sustained capital growth.

---

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---